The Initial, Failed Demolition of WTC7
I just realized that is what CNN's Allen Dodds Frank was talking about, when he reported explosions and another building collapse at 10:45 am-- AFTER the north tower went down. Now Frank doesn't specifically mention WTC7 in his report, but the most logical assumption is that he was referring to WTC7 when he refers to 50 stories going down. Frank was obviously wrong about WTC7 going down, but clearly something happened to spur his report and now we know that the demise of WTC7 was "in the works" early on.
It's crucial to note that a few people specifically reported explosions in WTC7, very early in the day, well before it finally went down:
Tris McCall
Barry Jennings
Michael Guttenberg
(From here and here.)
Of course, the media was predicting the collapse of WTC7 for several hours before it finally it went down. CNN's Rose Arce was reporting the imminent collapse of WTC7 as early as 12:22 PM:
Anonymous Physicist has hypothesized that the initial demolition of WTC7 failed due to "fizzled" nukes, and I think that is the best explanation we have for now of what happened to WTC7.
It's crucial to note that a few people specifically reported explosions in WTC7, very early in the day, well before it finally went down:
Tris McCall
Barry Jennings
Michael Guttenberg
(From here and here.)
Of course, the media was predicting the collapse of WTC7 for several hours before it finally it went down. CNN's Rose Arce was reporting the imminent collapse of WTC7 as early as 12:22 PM:
Anonymous Physicist has hypothesized that the initial demolition of WTC7 failed due to "fizzled" nukes, and I think that is the best explanation we have for now of what happened to WTC7.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home