Key WTC7 Topics

1. suspicious tenants--

25th Floor Tenants: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Department of Defense (DOD), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)

24th Floor Tenant: IRS

23th Floor Tenant: Office of Emergency Management (OEM)-- Giuliani's "bunker"

11th-13th Floors Tenant: Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

9th and 10th Floors Tenant: US Secret Service

The rest of the floors are mostly banking, stock broker and insurance entities.


2. built over substation -- awkward lower foundation?

3. exact cause extent of fire-- unknown, why was it localized more to south side (as it apparently was?)

4. extent of damage from WTC1 debris (other mechanisms)-- unknown

5. fireproofing should have been intact

6. why not more effort to fight the fires if a valuable building?

7. almost perfect free-fall straight down collapse, rubble in almost perfect footprint

8. expected/predicted/planned collapse-- videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9TL_PEMkdM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vr5TxKTMRx0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uVdnFFNbPK8

9. do videos of WTC7 falling show demolition squibs? Controversy over this?

10. explosion sounds (9/11 Eyewitness, YouTube videos)

11. Silverstein's "pull it" comment"

12. diesel fuel tanks -- mostly on lower floors and basement -- much of it recovered unburned-- how much burned?

13. wilted huge steel Calder structure in front of WTC7-- sign of exotic weaponry?

14. demolition of WTC7 a cover-story for WTC1 and WTC2 demolitions?


Good WTC7 references--

http://www.wtc7.net/articles/FEMA/WTC_ch5.htm

http://thewebfairy.com/nerdcities/WTC/WTC_ch5.htm
(different links to same article and comment on the FEMA report)

9/11 Eyewitness

Was WTC7 the "Cover-Story" for Unconventional Demolition of WTC1 and WTC2?

WTC7 serves as a beautiful official cover-story. Thus, at the official propaganda level, gov't officials could point to WTC7 and say "see-- another large steel-framed skyscraper completely collapsed from structural damage and fire."

WTC7 also serves as a perfect limited hang-out for covering-up the unconventional demolition of WTC1 and WTC2. Thus, at the limited hangout propaganda level, gov't moles/disinfo agents could point to WTC7 and say "see-- this building was clearly brought down by standard controlled demolition-- that must be what happened for WTC1 and WTC2."

I think the evidence strongly supports the idea that WTC1 and WTC2 were brought down by high-tech unconventional weapons (e.g. Star Wars-type beam weapon devices), and that a major goal of the 9/11 perpetrators and their disinfo agents is to keep this covered up at all costs.

Moreover, I think it is likely that WTC7 was brought down in a more standard controlled demolition fashion-- and in a manner for EVERYONE to see-- precisely to serve as a cover-story for the WTC towers.